Archive for January, 2008

Hillary Clinton “Crying” Sound bite


Once in every election there is a sound bite where something dramatic occurs that supposedly turns the election. Usually, the news media get this wrong. Here is the clip where Senator Clinton allegedly cries in New Hampshire. Only, if you look closely, she doesn’t actually cry—she simply speaks in emotional terms. In 2004, Howard Dean’s scream allegedly destroyed his campaign. In truth his campaign had already peaked and John Kerry had already destroyed Dean in Iowa.In 1987 Gary Hart supposedly destroyed his campaign by issuing a challenge to the press “Go ahead and follow me around. You won’t find anything and you will be bored.” But what everyone always forgets is the story where that this was quoted came out one day AFTER the Miami Herald broke the story about Hart’s Monkey Business. Did Ed Muskie’s crying in New Hampshire destroy his candidacy in 1972? In truth he was an establishment candidate who didn’t campaign very hard and was seen as a sinking ship. Even the supposed tears on his face are questionable, given that it was snowing on him at the time.So what’s the point? I am a lifelong fan of politics and the art of the sound bite. But the more I follow both, I realize that the political media and other observers will often latch on to a sound bite to try to impose a narrative onto a story and to establish a cause and effect when it fact all they are doing is guessing. I think Hillary Clinton’s emotional moment in New Hampshire was a compelling emotional moment. But did it turn the election? I find that a dubious proposition.

, , , ,

No Comments

The Future of Internet video on Public Speaking Blogs

I’ve just gone through a list of 70 of the top public speaking blogs. I was struck by how few actually had experts speaking about speaking in a video or audio format.

As much as youtube and internet video get attention these days, text is still the default medium for people who wish to communicate ideas on the web. How much longer will this be the case? I started doing an Internet radio talk show in 1998—nobody listened. In 2000 I started a daily video and audio political blog—no one watched. Three years ago, I started doing daily speaking video segments on The Speaking Channel. The audience has been, shall we charitably say, less than Superbowl sized.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

No Comments

Body Language Analysis of Roger Clemons

A number of body language experts have been having a field day analyzing recent testimony from baseball great Roger Clemons as he denies steroid use. The New York Times has a story where various body language experts weigh in. While I am a big believer in the idea that people who speak need to be very attentive to how their body language augments or undercuts their messages, I’ve always been skeptical of experts who claim to be able to tell instantly if someone is lying simply by analyzing body language.

Here is the most telling piece from today’s Times story, “Even the most skilled body-language experts are right in only about half of all cases, he (retired FBI body language expert Joe Navarro) said, and investigators often study body language to decide when to dig deeper.”

Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment

The Speaking Channel Re-launches

We have just re-organized and re-launched The Speaking Channel into 27 different communities. We found it was too confusing to put people into one main site because people thought we were just about professional speakers or just about PowerPoint. Now, we have things sub-divided into neater categories–or at least that is our hope. Please take a look at the site and send us feedback on any additional hubs you think we may have left out.

, ,

No Comments

Using Video to Introduce a Public Speaker

Here is a great video used to introduce bill Gates before his last keynote speech at the Consumer Electronics Show. The video is funny and well done. But I feel it should come with a warning: Don’t try this at home kids! Why? Because it is extraordinarily time-consuming and expensive to put together a video like this. My advice? Most speakers are better off coming up with an interesting speech rather than getting lost in the details of editing a video. So if you have the resources of Microsoft behind you and you are good friends with international celebrities like Gates, then go for the fancy videos. If not, think twice before going to these lengths.

, ,

1 Comment

So how did the candidates do in the victory and consolation speeches?

Mitt Romney—I thought he seemed down, depressed, and as if his whole world were caving in. Other pundits thought it was his best speech of the campaign—candid, genuine and personal.

Mike Huckabee—He was his usual Huckabee, i.e., funny, personal, emotional, and empathetic. Huckabee is Rush Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan, James Carville and Gomer Pyle combined. He looked and sounded like a winner.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , ,

2 Comments

Fees for Guest Experts on TV

In America, the fastest way to look like a rank amateur is to ask a TV producer what you will be paid for being interviewed. You don’t usually get any fee unless you have been on for free as a guest and now are being promoted to the level of an official commentator or expert for that show or network. But in England, for example, the rules are different. Check out this article for how things are done there.

, ,

No Comments

Getting Your Elevator Pitch Straight

I just attend a BNI business networking event this morning in Rockefeller Center here in Manhattan. This is an opportunity for business people and entrepreneurs to network and give their elevator pitches to a room full of 35 colleagues. Here is a list of the three most common blunders:

1. Starting off with “good morning, my name is…” This is boring and you were already introduced.
2. Listing educational and certification credentials. No one cares that you spend 90 hours on a mortgage broker study course.
3. Ad slogans don’t work in a 30 second into—leave those for your brochure or business card.

Read the rest of this entry »

,

1 Comment

Is Your Next Speech a Media Event?

If you hold an interesting position in yhour industry or are high profile in any way, you must keep in mind that any audience you speak to these days may be filled with bloggers. And these bloggers may be commenting on your speech. So just because you don’t see TV cameras in the audience or people with “press” hats on, doesn’t mean that your comments are somehow off the record–they aren’t. Everything you say must be considered through this prisim: How do I feel if this is quoted on a web site that has a million ivsitiorslooking at it during the next two years?

How common is it for speeches to be blogged about today: Here’s just a partial list of people who blogged about Bill Gates’ Speech at the CES yesterday.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

No Comments

Moving From the Public Speaking Audience to the Public Speaking Platform

Every day I receive a Google alert for the phrase “call for speakers.” Daily, organizations around the world are looking for speakers to present at their conferences. Most of the time, these speaking gigs are unpaid, but are excellent opportunities for executives, consultants, authors and others to showcase their organizations and expertise. So how do you get to present at the trade association conventions you attend every year?

Follow these steps:

Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

1 Comment

Democratic Debate Summary

Below you will find a real time analysis of both the Democratic and Republican Presidential debates.

Here is final analysis of the Democratic debate.

This seems like a horrible dodge, but I have to give a three-way tie for first to John Edwards, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton. all three were at their best. They all played to their strengths. No one made any big blunders or mistakes. Each used compelling logic and made forceful appeals, plus showed signs of likability.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Debate-final movements

Clinton. On what she’d like to take back from debate. not buch.

Richardson was candid on wizzer white pick as favorite Supreme Court judge.

Edwards. Funny and self-effacing about hilliary’s jacket.

Obama. fine close.

, , , ,

1 Comment

Democratic Debate-Carbon Tax

Richardson. Spoke well on Carbon tax.

Obama. He seems well-versed on this and all other subjects. Obama comes across as quite knowledgeable.

Clinton. Nice tailoring of energy costs as they relate to people of New Hampshire. clinotn does not sound shrill or strident. The format of sitting down and beign close to people helps her sound conversational.

Edwards. He has really refined his populist message and delivery. But he’s not sounding protectionist or anti-globalism.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

1 Comment

Democratic Debate

Edwards. Making populist arguments and sounding convincing.
Edwards on what he accomplished in the Senate: patients bill of rights. he made a good argument here and was personal and named names of people it would help. Came across as committed and passionate. Great energy.

Clinton. She nailed Edwards on the fact that his legislation never passed. i.e., he didn’t accomplish anything. She nailed Edwards. Then she nailed Obama. “Words are not actions” she is slamming Edwards and Obama in a forceful and fair manner.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Democrat debate-2nd half

Clinton. Was really funny when she said “it hurts my feelings.” she seemed genuine and funny and likeable. And she said Obama was likeable. Did a great job of dealing with issue that voters think edwards and obama would create more change.

Obama. Seemed funny saying he was watching football instead of gop debate. seems positive, upbeat and inclusive.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Democratic debate re Iraq

re surge working

Clinton. “23 americans dying in December is unacceptible.”

Richardson. He weaves back and forth from being lucid and then stammering. He is hammering the desk in front of him in a distracting manner.

Obama. sounds stonger and more confident re Iraq.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Debate Democratic

All our attacking each other. They are becoming more forceful. Clinton seems much more forceful.

Obama was strong.

Richardson had great laugh line “I’ve been in hostage neg. more civil than this.” He seemed statemanlike.

Candidates were talking about “change” “change” “change” to the point of sounding silly.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

1 Comment

Debate

Thompson on terrorism. he is sounding intelligent and thoughtful.

Giuliani snapping back at Ron Paul. 

Ron Paul snaps back.

Romney hops in and sounds forceful.

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

Dem debate re change

Cinton re change. She doesn’t seem comfortable attacking Obama on issue of change. She says he changes his posiiton on healthcare. She is stammering a little.

Obama. Stammering a little in his defense of his healthcare policies. He comes out in favor of higher payroll taxes.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

1 Comment

Dem debate 2nd q re a-bomb

Edwards. speaks in favor of being calm. Seems stateman-like.

Obama. His stripped tie is pixilating. White shirt is bad. He still sounds a little hesitant.

Clinton. She sounds conversational, confident, experienced.
She sounds tough re retaliating. Clinton looks good in green.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments